page 115

the processes carried out have continued, specifically at the registered office and among the principal contributing entities. Reporting times for social data have also been reduced as part of the “Fast Close” plan, without affecting the reliability of the reported data. Nevertheless, the proper application and oversight of the reporting criteria needs to be improved at entities abroad, especially as it relates to data on training and the calculation of hours worked. the processes carried out have continued, specifically at the registered office
and among the principal contributing entities. Reporting times for social data
have also been reduced as part of the “Fast Close” plan, without affecting the
reliability of the reported data. Nevertheless, the proper application and
oversight of the reporting criteria needs to be improved at entities abroad,
especially as it relates to data on training and the calculation of hours
worked.

CONCLUSION

Moderate assurance

Based on our review, we did not identify any material anomaly that could cast doubt on the fact that the data identified by the symbol • were prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the above- mentioned reporting criteria. Based on our review, we did not identify any material anomaly that could cast
doubt on the fact that the data identified by the symbol • were prepared, in
all material respects, in accordance with the above- mentioned reporting
criteria.

Reasonable assurance

In our opinion, the data identified by the symbol •• were prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the above-mentioned reporting criteria. In our opinion, the data identified by the symbol •• were prepared, in all
material respects, in accordance with the above-mentioned reporting criteria.

Neuilly-sur-Seine, 3/18/11 Statutory Auditors ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

Charles-Emmanuel Chosson

Pascal Macioce

NOTES

(1) These data are the following [contribution to Group data of the entities selected for our review is indicated in parentheses]: proportion of women in management (61%); age pyramid (70%); turnover (61%); rate of resignation – voluntary turnover (58%); recruitment rate (68%); frequency rate (TF) of accidents in the workplace (per hour worked) (70%). (1) These data are the following [contribution to Group data of the entities
selected for our review is indicated in parentheses]: proportion of women in
management (61%); age pyramid (70%); turnover (61%); rate of resignation –
voluntary turnover (58%); recruitment rate (68%); frequency rate (TF) of
accidents in the workplace (per hour worked) (70%).

(2) These data are the following [contribution to Group data of the entities selected for our review is indicated in parentheses]: installed capacity for renewable energy recovery (100%); useful renewable energy production (99%); total primary and secondary energy consumption (90%); direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions (76%); drinking water supply – linear index of network losses (in relation to the amount of drinking water injected into the network) (87%); total workforce (70%); managers (56%); non-managers (61%); gender distribution – proportion of women in the workforce (59%); hours of training per person (68%); proportion of employees receiving training (69%). (2) These data are the following [contribution to Group data of the entities
selected for our review is indicated in parentheses]: installed capacity for
renewable energy recovery (100%); useful renewable energy production (99%);
total primary and secondary energy consumption (90%); direct and indirect
greenhouse gas emissions (76%); drinking water supply – linear index of
network losses (in relation to the amount of drinking water injected into the
network) (87%); total workforce (70%); managers (56%); non-managers (61%);
gender distribution – proportion of women in the workforce (59%); hours of
training per person (68%); proportion of employees receiving training (69%).

(3) Degrémont (Nice Haliotis and Durango sites), United Water (Springfield and Delaware sites), Lyonnaise des Eaux France (BU and Dunkerque – Northern Coast site), Agbar (Mataró site), SITA France (BU, review of SITA Sud Ouest, Orizane and Le Teich sites) and TERIS France (BU and Beautor site), SITA Sweden (BU, Kovik site), SITA Waste Services (BU and Pillar Point and Went sites), SITA Australia (BU and Hallam site), SITA UK (BU, review of Processing South West, Runfold Landfill and Isle of Man EFW sites). (3) Degrémont (Nice Haliotis and Durango sites), United Water (Springfield and
Delaware sites), Lyonnaise des Eaux France (BU and Dunkerque – Northern Coast
site), Agbar (Mataró site), SITA France (BU, review of SITA Sud Ouest, Orizane
and Le Teich sites) and TERIS France (BU and Beautor site), SITA Sweden (BU,
Kovik site), SITA Waste Services (BU and Pillar Point and Went sites), SITA
Australia (BU and Hallam site), SITA UK (BU, review of Processing South West,
Runfold Landfill and Isle of Man EFW sites).

(4) Sita France (BU, and North, Southwest and Île-de-France regions), SITA Czech Republic, SITA Waste Services, SITA El Beïda, SITA UK, Lyonnaise des Eaux France, Lydec, SITA Germany, SITA Poland, SITA Sweden, Agbar. (4) Sita France (BU, and North, Southwest and Île-de-France regions), SITA
Czech Republic, SITA Waste Services, SITA El Beïda, SITA UK, Lyonnaise des
Eaux France, Lydec, SITA Germany, SITA Poland, SITA Sweden, Agbar.